0800 612 1302 Call 9am - 7pm Mon - Fri Email: queries@gocarwarranty.co.uk GO Car Warranty

Drivers' text life 'not improved by voices'

Drivers' text life 'not improved by voices' Image

New research suggests that when it comes to drivers texting, new voice-to-SMS methods are just as dangerous as traditional manual means.

The Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) study found that voice-to-text drivers enjoyed no safety advantages.

Researchers tested the performance of 43 drivers on a course in the first study of its kind, initially without use of any mobile phone device.

Each respondent then travelled the course three more times performing a series of texting tasks - once using each of two voice-to-text applications (SiriŽ for the iPhone and VlingoŽ for Android), and once texting manually.

A breakdown of the study shows:

- driver response times were substantially delayed, regardless of which texting method was used - with drivers taking almost twice as long to react as they did when they weren't texting

- the amount of time that motorists spent looking at the road ahead was a lot less when they were texting, regardless of texting method

- manual texting needed slightly less time than the voice-to-text method for most exercises, but driver performance was about the same with both

- motorists felt less safe when texting but safer when using a voice-to-text application than when texting manually.


published: 25/04/2013 14:00:00

back | more from Insurance 

Call Me Back

 

Most popular road trips in the UK link image

more Offbeat News

Profile of the Tesla Model S link image

more Technology News

Top five bestselling child car seats link image

more Car Buying Tips News

News Archive

link image 2017
link image 2016
link image 2015
link image 2014
link image 2013
link image 2012
link image 2011
link image 2010